The Internet has become one of the vital ways to make available resources for research and learning for both teachers and students to share and acquire information

The Internet has become one of the vital ways to make available resources for research and learning for both teachers and students to share and acquire information (Richard and Haya 2009). E-learning has changed the landscape of university teaching, sometimes in unexpected ways. Again e-learning allows for efficient transfer of knowledge anywhere and anytime, regardless of subject matter. It opens up a world of learning unavailable in most corners of the world, while at the same time empowering learners with the information technology, awareness and skills crucial to succeed in today global knowledge economy.
According to Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2005) “E-lear1. Introduction
The Internet has become one of the vital ways to make available resources for research and learning for both teachers and students to share and acquire information (Richard and Haya 2009). E-learning has changed the landscape of university teaching, sometimes in unexpected ways. Again e-learning allows for efficient transfer of knowledge anywhere and anytime, regardless of subject matter. It opens up a world of learning unavailable in most corners of the world, while at the same time empowering learners with the information technology, awareness and skills crucial to succeed in today global knowledge economy.
According to Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2005) “E-learning is defined as the use of information and communication technologies in diverse processes of education to support and enhance learning in institutions of higher education, and includes the usage of information and communication technology as a complement to traditional classrooms, online learning or mixing the two modes”.
Furthermore Wentling et al (2000) explains that e-learning refers to the attainment and use of knowledge that are predominantly facilitated and distributed by electronic means. To them, the e-learning depends on computers and networks, but it is likely it will progress into systems comprising of a variety of channels such as wireless and satellite, and technologies such as cellular phones (Wentling et al., 2000).
In their literature review on definitions for e-learning, Liu and Wang (2009) found that the features of e-learning process are chiefly centered on the internet; global sharing and learning resources; information broadcasts and knowledge flow by way of network courses, and lastly flexibility of learning as computer-generated environment for learning is created to overcome issues of distance and time (Liu and Wang, 2009).
However, Gotschall (2000) argues that the concept of e-learning is proposed based on distance learning, thus a transmission of lectures to distant locations by way of video presentations.
I therefore argue that e-learning means engaging in an educational online course which are in different forms. The techniques may vary like presentations and surveys. This assignment is focused on the benefits of using E-learning platforms in higher education. Also emphasizing challenges and the strategies of E-learning that encountered in higher education.
2. What are the benefits of using E-learning platforms in higher education?
The reception of E-learning in training, particularly for higher educational institutions has a few advantages, and given its few points of interest and advantages, e-learning is considered among the best strategies for instruction. E-learning is that it permits adaptability and open learning for the students subsequently giving them an opportunity to take care of different things, for example, working. Expanded interest for off-grounds or separation learning is probably going to make a bigger land showcase particularly for little establishments through online instruction frameworks. These benefits are briefly discussed below:
2.1 Easy to monitor
“E-learning programs are easier to monitor than traditional class-based courses because e-learners are given the opportunity to interact with faculty members, instructors and other peers via electronic mail. He further adds that E-learning is likely to result in cost savings both for the students and the institutions in various ways” (Kahiigi, 2007).
2.2 Flexible
It is adaptable when issues of time and place are contemplated. Each student has the advantage of picking the place and time that suits them. According to Smedley (2010), the adoption of e-learning provides the institutions as well as their students or learners the much flexibility of time and place of delivery or receipt of according to learning information.
2.3 Enhances qualification
E-learning improves the adequacy of information and capabilities by means of simple entry to a huge amount of data/information.
2.4 Ice breaker
It can give chances to relations between students by the utilization of talk gatherings. Through this, e-learning kills hindrances that have the capability of preventing investment including the dread of conversing with different students. E-learning inspires understudies to cooperate with other, and in addition trade and regard distinctive purpose of perspectives. E-learning facilitates correspondence and furthermore enhances the connections that manage learning. Wagner et al (2008) note that e-Learning makes available extra prospects for interactivity between students and teachers during content delivery.
2.5 More Fun
Illustrating a course in a way that makes it instinctive and fun utilizing sight and sound or the all the more starting late made methodologies.
2.6 Savvy
This is facilitated to the two students and lecturers, anyway there is a not too bad probability that whatever part you expected to pay extreme measures of money eventually to get invigorated variations of perusing material for school or school. While at the same time perusing material consistently end up obsolete after a particular time span, the need to persistently increase new forms is missing in e-learning.
2.7 It Just Fits
As higher education grasp progressions to improve the capability of regular assignments, the usage of the web transforms into a need.
3. Challenges and strategies of E-learning face by higher education.
“While debate rages hotly over the advantages and shortcomings of using technology in a myriad of ways in all walks of life, language teachers struggle to catch up or keep up with the heap of newly invented digital gadgets to effectively adopt them for their own agenda of language pedagogy” (Smith 2000). A wide array of these challenges and strategies can broadly be categorized in these areas: learning style and cultural challenges, pedagogical E-learning challenges, technological challenges, technical training challenges, time management challenges, developed quality.
3.1 Learning Style and Cultural Challenges
Everyone has their own learning style along with their cultural influences; the ones who are taught using their own learning style and taking into consideration cultural aspects of individuals wiper form better academically (Sywelem et al., 2012). The facilitative gaining moves from the solid instructor focused figuring out how to what is known as self-coordinated realizing, where the academic uses different techniques by recognizing students past involvement and learning styles to urge understudy to wind up free students. To be a skilled academic, to be a facilitator they must be able in their insight base, have certainty, specialist and be empathic to students needs and individual learning style.
At the point when the student has an inclination to a specific learning style then it wind up hard to learn different ways, which implies academics should know about various styles and needs to configuration learning materials that empowers students to learn. This is the most imperative part of academic. In this manner understanding learning style is basic thought amid course outline and foundations ought to give assets and preparing to academics to address this difficulty. Anyway this is a tedious and expensive errand, parcel of time and exertion is required and the courses material and students learning style must be evaluated when new student partner joins. On the off chance that learning style isn’t perceived then a probability of learning won’t be accomplished and it is the most essential test to meet.
To accomplish the best learning result it is attractive to have a comprehension of students’ learning styles. Online students’ learning styles can be vague, this has suggestions on how academics create learning material. A few students learn through associating, some favor learning through visual introduction, and some by tuning in to guidelines and utilizing composed notes. This test has a suggestion on the learning results and represents a significant issue for academics to comprehend the learning styles of their students in an e-learning condition.
3.2 Pedagogical E-learning Challenges
Productive instructional technique requires the teacher to perceive how students learn then blueprint and pass on course materials, and guide students appropriately, with the objective that data and capacities are passed on. Along these lines, e-learning will make the entry on hypothesis. Showing strategy should be the establishment to any e-learning advancement; without educational principals learning will be hampered?
E-learning requires an alternate way to deal with teaching method particularly in territories, for example, individual and gathering collaboration and online evaluation. Anyway these aptitudes are not outsider to all, remove instruction has been around for quite a long time utilizing postal administrations, TV, and phone.
Learning different pedagogical online strategies by teachers is not sufficient in an online learning environment, it should include academics correctly interpreting students’ online written text, understanding the context, and understating group dynamics with individual needs. This will then make online learning more successful (Turvey, 2008; Loveless, 2011).
In order for academics to effectively make the transition to become online teachers they need to do more than just develop new ICT skills; it should be pedagogy based (Morley, 2010).
And in addition understudy learning style, the Pedagogy is a vital and genuine thought for learning, for it is the manner in which academic directs learning, it isn’t tied in with dumping data on a site and trusting students will learn it, however a procedure to be taken after to empower instructional method in the e-learning devices, which foundations should indicate most extreme significance.
The procedure that can be produced while acquainting new innovation with the classroom, it is basic to guarantee that there is a sound teaching method behind the move, not only a craving to utilize new toys. Understudies can be overpowered with an excessive amount of innovation, or confounded by severely utilized or seriously setup innovation.
3.3 Technological Challenges
Technical challenge refers to advancement issues, for example, the bugs, the speed, the blunders, capacities and highlights not accurately working or don’t work as indicated by what academics require. Technical support to academics is lacking in comparison to the desire of learning success and the profound use of e-learning technology. The great desire is met with insufficient investment in infrastructure and technological assistance (Reeder et al., 2004: 91-92).
Technical errors, bugs, gradualness is basic if academics are to utilize the framework and is basic to the achievement of the e-learning innovation, if the framework does not work accurately then the innovation won’t be utilized and pessimism will emerge in utilizing e-learning innovation, which has a major repercussion for institutions as they have contributed hugely so the innovation ought to be utilized successfully for the arrival in speculation.
3.4 Technical Training Challenges
Training challenge refers to the preparation necessity that will empower academics to take in the e-learning highlights and capacities accurately and to utilize them adequately. In looking into e-learning writing, there are different reactions of poor preparing given by institutions to academics.
Issues have been raised that incorporate insufficient preparing, deficient preparing, preparing styles being used that don’t fit academic individual inclinations, absence of hands on training, and furthermore how to make materials concurring the pedagogical requirement was absent from the preparation situation.
Some students who joins universities are still novices, they don’t know anything about computers as they have never used them before, but of course there are some who have knowledge and have used computers before. If the capabilities of students are at best intermediate then there has to be organized training for the students? If sufficient training is not implemented then the burden of training will fall on the overburdened academics.
Gerrard (2002) states the need of academics is understood as technological skill improvement such as how to create a better presentation and how to upload it on e-learning systems rather than learning new E-teaching skills to improve and aid student learning. Therefore providing adequate training would help academics do their job effectively whether this relates to managing online discussion forums, or identifying pedagogical needs amongst students (Allan et al., 2012). Preparing is crucial how to academics use instructional method in the e-learning condition, how would they adjust learning style in their material, effectively utilizing the e-learning highlights are essential, if academics don’t know then venture won’t yield the normal outcome.
The strategy to combat this challenge can be by arranging extra classes or training workshops for both students and teachers so that they can have more knowledge get the maximum advantage of ICT.
3.5 Time Management Challenges
Academics that use e-learning systems face difficulties in managing their time. According to Reeder (2004) some of the “cyber culture values” are characterized by speed, reach and quick response. However in recommendations set out by Burd and Buchman (2004), the prerequisite needed to be an effective online instructor is that academics must visit the discussion page at least once a day to see if there is a posting by students.
The traditional methods of learning have changed, teacher and student roles remain, but e-learning allows the 24 hours a day for a class to run, and verbal conversation have been replaced with a permanent written discussion forum where students can update any time of the day or night (Clark, 2001). This means academics have to be working nights, weekends and holidays as the student expects to have a reply immediately and “if things go wrong then they have a semi-permanent existence on the screen” (Gustafson and Gibbs, 2010:p208).
An overwhelming interest is made on scholastics when e-learning is presented, if scholastics are exhausted and don’t have time then understudy learning will endure, particularly when they are not being made up for the additional work they are doing, which will prompt low scholarly good and may risk learning and establishment picture to be harmed.
3.4 Developed quality
Another test detailed is the degree to which quality e-substance can be created and incorporated into educational modules. Innovation can be incorporated into any educational modules into significant profundity.
Understudies just need, in a speaker’s words, a lot of support to really utilize these mechanical sophistications and instructors require a touch of force developed on them before they turn into a fundamental piece of learning process.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, several authors have explained that that higher education institutions need to provide professional development for instructors, trainings for learners, and technical support for the content development and delivery of online courses to address the challenges in online education and enhance the effectiveness of online teaching and learning.
“Contemporary evidence across the higher education sector points to an increase in flexibility for educational delivery in every institution. The growing need for adult education, postgraduate coursework, first degrees for mature aged students and continuing professional development all require flexibility of access and delivery, including more distance education” (Bradley, 2008).
These challenges are vital to understand for any institution longing for an effective e-learning result. Lecturers need a decent hold on innovation and empowering state of mind towards e-learning for a positive learning result. This implies significant sprinkling must be passed onto all academics for a foundation to be effective in accomplishing their higher academic targets. Academics ought not to be there for specialized help for students, rather they should be prepared on the innovation so astute posts, recordings and instructional exercises are utilized viably.
The preparation ought not to be an outline but rather commonsense, hands on until the point when academics are sure utilizing the frameworks set up. Students state of mind and experience is imperative, with the correct preparing to utilize innovation for learning, if students don’t have the correct preparing and bolster then academics will be the main line of contact to help with specialized issues.
In this assignment I have focused on the benefits and challenges of E-learning in higher education
To upgrade the adequacy of ICT learning condition, instructors and students must be given adequate help regarding preparing, hardware and time resources. There will likewise be levels of popularity on conveying the training adaptably; pace savvy and conveyance insightful. The students are regularly working or concentrate simultaneously and this contends for exams and exercises to be given in an open way where students can pick what time of day assignments and exams ought to be directed. With respect to the conveyance mode we find that while framework effort is low and network sporadic one ought to give elective intends to instruction conveyance, particularly for self-contemplating students. The arrangement of elective correspondence channels would significantly enhance outreach – messages ought to be supplemented with letters, LMS addresses with CD ROMs, etc.

References
ALI, A. (2008). Issues and challenges in implementing e-learning in Malaysia. Open University
ALLAN, J., ; LAWLESS, N. (2004) Understanding and reducing stress in collaborative e-Learning. Electronic Journal on e-Learning, 2(1), 121-128
BRADLEY, D. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Discussion paper. Available: http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/reviews/highered_review/default.htm. Accessed: Accessed: 31 July 2018
BURD, A., ; BUCHANAN. (2004). Teaching the teachers: teaching and learning online. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516 (01)00054-9ervice Review, 32(4), 404-412. Accessed: 11 August 2018.
CLARK, J. (2001). Stimulating collaboration and discussion in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 119-124.
GOTSCHALL M. (2000). E-learning strategies for executive education and corporate training. Fortune 141(10): 5–59.
GUSTAFSON, P., ; GIBBS, D. (2000). Guiding or hiding? The role of the facilitator in online teaching and learning. Teaching Education, 11(2), 195-210. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698967. Accessed: 11 August 2018.
KAHIIGI, E. (2007). Exploring the E-learning State of Art, The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6 (2), pp.77 -88
LIU, Y., ; WANG, H. (2009). A comparative study on e-learning technologies and products: from the East to the West. Systems Research ; Behavioral Science, 26(2), 191–209.
LOVELESS, A. (2011). Technology, pedagogy and education: reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 301-316. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.610931. Accessed: 10 august 18.
MALAYSIA (OUM). Annual Report 2008. Available: http://asiapacificodl2.oum.edu.my/C33/F80.pdf. Accessed: 31 July 2018
MORLEY, G. (2010). Suggestions to Assist Primary Teachers in Keeping Pace with ICT: Teachers’ Experiences in England. 2nd International Conference on Education, Economy & Society, 21-24, Paris, France. (Unpublished).
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). (2005) “E-learning in Tertiary Education”. Policy Briefs. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/27/35/35991871.pdf. Accessed: 10 august 18.
OYE, N.D, MAZLEENA, S AND IAHAD, N.A. 2011. Challenges of e-Learning in Nigerian university education based on the experience of developed countries. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT) Vol.3, No.2.
REEDER, K., MACFADYEN, L.P., CHASE, M., & ROCHE, J. (2004). Negotiating culture in cyberspace: participation patterns and problematics, Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 88-105.
RICHARD, H., & HAYA, A. (2009). Examining student decision to adopt web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of computing in higher education, 21(3), 183-198.
SMEDLEY, J.K. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight (2010) 23, 233–250.
SMITH, E. H. (2000). Technology in the classroom: Practice and promise in the 21st century (part 1), TESOL Quarterly. TESOL professional papers (2). Available: http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_document.asp?CID=403&DID=1064. Accessed: 31 July 2018
SYWELEM, M., AL-HARBI, Q., FATHEMA, N., & WITTE, J. (2012). Learning style preferences of student teachers: A cross-cultural perspective. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1, 10-24.
TURVEY, K. (2008). Student teachers go online; the need for a focus on human agency and pedagogy in learning about ‘e-learning’ in initial teacher education (ITE). Education and Information Technologies, 13(10), 317–327. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9072-x. Accessed: 11 August 2018.
WENTLING T.L, WAIGHT C, GALLAGHER J, LA FLEUR J, WANG C, KANFER A. (2000). E-learning – a review of literature. Knowledge and Learning Systems Group NCSA 9.1–73.
ning is defined as the use of information and communication technologies in diverse processes of education to support and enhance learning in institutions of higher education, and includes the usage of information and communication technology as a complement to traditional classrooms, online learning or mixing the two modes”.
Furthermore Wentling et al (2000) explains that e-learning refers to the attainment and use of knowledge that are predominantly facilitated and distributed by electronic means. To them, the e-learning depends on computers and networks, but it is likely it will progress into systems comprising of a variety of channels such as wireless and satellite, and technologies such as cellular phones (Wentling et al., 2000).
In their literature review on definitions for e-learning, Liu and Wang (2009) found that the features of e-learning process are chiefly centered on the internet; global sharing and learning resources; information broadcasts and knowledge flow by way of network courses, and lastly flexibility of learning as computer-generated environment for learning is created to overcome issues of distance and time (Liu and Wang, 2009).
However, Gotschall (2000) argues that the concept of e-learning is proposed based on distance learning, thus a transmission of lectures to distant locations by way of video presentations.
I therefore argue that e-learning means engaging in an educational online course which are in different forms. The techniques may vary like presentations and surveys. This assignment is focused on the benefits of using E-learning platforms in higher education. Also emphasizing challenges and the strategies of E-learning that encountered in higher education.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now