Bad wonderful decision making skills and abilities. Narendra Modi

Bad leaders are more like good leaders
than they are extraordinary. But bad leadership clarifies the qualities of
style, identity and inspiration that must be taken into consideration in the setting
in which they matter.

Bad and good leaders are described by
attributes, for example –

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now


A high level of energy

A strong drive for power




Good at decision making

Differences between a good and a bad
leader –




Lack of vision


No energy

interpersonal skills

Lack of interpersonal skills

communication skills

Lack of communication skills

characteristics of dominance

High measure of predominance in their

measure of emotional stability

Lack of emotional stability


No indication of being empathetic

of a good leader in India –

Narendra Modi is a case of perfect leader. He is the one with demeanour and
extraordinary identity. He is a good orator and knows how to influence
individuals with content just accurate to put his point clearly. He is without
a doubt attractive as a leader. Either consider the case of Gujarat or of the present
situations, Narendra Modi possesses wonderful decision making skills and
abilities. Narendra Modi is very sure and confident with the moves he makes. He
is visionary and has the ability to influence masses. He loves serving his
countrymen and works almost 18 hours every day. His calm attitude makes all
other people talk to him frankly and discuss the issues. He is very famous for
his ability to solve lengthy and difficult conflicts. He knows how to use his
talent wisely.

Example of a bad leader in India –

Mr. Rahul Gandhi is a case of a leader who has
characteristics which makes him a bad leader. He has not so far given any
confirmation of scholarly start. He has not shown any leadership qualities by
way of thoughts, ideas and activities. He is neither a decent speaker nor a man
who has any sort of vision for India. His capacity to comprehend and
intelligently examine the complex inward and outside issues confronting the
nation is yet to be demonstrated. His perspectives have a tendency to be
extremely oversimplified and don’t demonstrate wide perusing and a capacity to
think profoundly. He does not have the functional information required to
settle on important choices.